
Environmental secretary narrows rail options to three
By Brian Boyd
bboyd@s-t.com
State environmental officials further narrowed the
possible routes for bringing commuter rail to New
Bedford, whittling down the list from five options to
three.
Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs Ian Bowles
issued a decision Friday that takes off the table two
options using the Lakeville/Middleboro station.
The Executive Office of Transportation will study the
remaining alternatives — rail through Attleboro, rail
through Stoughton and rapid bus service — and announce a
preliminary decision around Labor Day. The project could
cost $1.4 billion.
"I am excited that we reached a decision point, because
it's another milestone in the progress of the project,"
said Kristina Egan, the state's manager of the South
Coast Rail project. "We're getting very close to making
an on-the-ground decision."
Mayor Scott W. Lang said he does not believe the bus
option would satisfy the area's needs, but he would go
along with any route that includes rail.
"If we're talking about options with rail, the simple
position is no matter what the route is, we will support
it," Lang said.
He added he would like the southern portion from New
Bedford and Fall River to Taunton built sooner rather
than later, to help start making the extension a
reality.
Bowles consulted with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
before deciding what alternatives merit further
consideration. Transportation officials also will study
the option of not building commuter rail, along with the
remaining options, according to the Executive Office of
Transportation.
One alternative eliminated by Bowles would send all
passengers through Middleboro. He rejected the "full"
version of this, which included a proposed tunnel in
Quincy, as impractical. He also dropped a less-intensive
version because "the ridership projections are
significantly lower than other alternatives," according
to his decision.
Bowles cut a second alternative, which would have sent
half of the trains through Middleboro and half through
Attleboro, saying it also is impractical.
A yearlong ridership study released in February showed
the Middleboro versions would draw fewer riders than the
other rail options. The Stoughton alternative using
electric-powered rail cars led the other options in
ridership, with a projection of 6,300 round-trip
passengers daily.
The Stoughton route had been chosen in a past study as
the best route. It raises environmental issues, though,
because it would run through the 6,000-acre Hockomock
Swamp.
The final three options are:
* Rail through Attleboro, providing service from Fall
River and New Bedford to South Station in Boston, via a
new bypass track through Norton and Attleboro. Both
electric and diesel rail will be considered as part of
this option.
* Rail through Stoughton to South Station. Both electric
and diesel rail will be weighed as part of this
alternative.
* Rapid bus service from Fall River, New Bedford and
Taunton to Boston, using a proposed dedicated bus lane
along Route 24 and Interstate 93.
The route decision will become definitive when the final
environmental document is completed, which is expected
by spring 2010.
"We are on schedule to restore transit service to Fall
River and New Bedford at a crucial time for the economy
of the region and the commonwealth," said Transportation
Secretary James Aloisi in a statement Monday.
The officials studying the rail options can benefit from
the narrower focus, Egan said.
"It's a big decision for us because we're able to use
resources with more efficiency," she said. "We can just
look at those three options in depth."
The survey teams researching the potential impact on
wetlands and wildlife will have to cover a smaller
geographic area, thanks to the narrowing of options, she
said.
April 07, 2009 6:00 AM
Source URL:
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090407/NEWS/904070335/-1/NEWS06 |