
New Bedford zoning board approves special permit for
Cliftex conversion
By Charis Anderson
The Zoning Board of
Appeals on Thursday unanimously approved a special
permit for a multimillion-dollar proposal to transform
the Cliftex 1 mill building into rental apartments.
"This is going to be an overall improvement, and it's
also going to preserve a mill that was slated for
demolition," said Christopher Saunders, the lawyer
representing the project before the board.
The project, which is located at 194 Riverside Ave.,
needed a special permit as it sits within the Riverside
Avenue Mill Overlay District; it also needed a special
permit to reduce the number of parking spaces required
by the city zoning code.
John Keith, president of Keith Construction in
Stoughton, and Boston-based Winn Development are
collaborating on the project, which is a proposal to
construct 150 rental apartments in two phases, Saunders
said.
Keith and Winn previously worked together on Whaler's
Place, also located on Riverside Avenue.
Eighty percent of the units, which will be reserved for
people aged 55 and older, will be affordable housing
while the remaining 20 percent will be market rate,
Saunders said.
The developers will build 150 parking spots, a number
that falls short of the 300 spots required under the
city zoning code for a development of this size,
Saunders said.
However, Saunders argued that the zoning code
requirements are invalid for this type of development,
pointing to Whaler's Place, which has less than one
parking spot per unit and where parking has not been an
issue.
Ward 2 City Councilor Steve Martins spoke in favor of
the project, saying it would help to help to create a
neighborhood feel in that area of the city — something
current residents at Whaler's Place and Whaler's Cove
say is missing, he said.
"I think it's long overdue that we turn that (area) into
a neighborhood," Martins said.
Former zoning board chairman Barry Sylvia spoke in favor
of the project but raised concerns about a letter board
member James Mathes had previously written to board that
stated it was not within the board's purview to examine
safety and environmental impacts.
Sylvia suggested Mathes might have predetermined
opinions and wanted a commitment that Mathes would
consider safety and environmental impacts in his
decision.
"I don't have any predetermined opinions," said Mathes,
who was not a member of the board when he wrote the
letter. "I'm reviewing this tonight based on what's
being proposed."
A representative of a building trades association spoke
against the project, stating he thought the mill would
be better used for an industrial purpose.
"If this project doesn't go forward, nothing's going to
go there," Saunders said. "This is a good project."
The project must now go before the city Traffic
Commission.
canderson@s-t.com
February 19, 2010
Source URL:
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100219/NEWS/2190318 |